Argument essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 2

Argument - Essay ExampleDisciplines that focus on arts, music, drama, and fields that venture into creativity have apparently been left behind. It is in this regard that the circulating(prenominal) argument aims to assert that schools and the contemporary educational system all over the world actually kill rather than naturalise creativity. In the video empower How Schools Kill Creativity presented online through TED Talks, a creativity expert, Sir Ken Robinson, contends that creativity now is as important in education as literacy, and we should treat it with the akin status (TED Conferences, LLC 1). In a highly interesting manner of delivery, Robinson initially affirms that the predominant themes in the conference focus on three components (a) the extraordinary designate of human creativity (b) the evidence of creativity placed people in an ambivalent situation or where there is no idea of what will beat out in the future and (c) there are extraordinary capacities for innovati on that children actually manifest. Robinson asserts that through the current educational system that pervades globally, children are actually cosmos made to restrict creative and innovative talents by emphasizing that it is not acceptable to be wrong. He cites Picasso as affirming that all children are born artists (1). To cultivate creativity, it is considered important to acknowledge to children not to be frightened of being wrong, for it is through committing mistakes that innovation and concepts of originality allegedly emerge. Likewise, Robinson also explained how the educational system follows a hierarchy of subjects, where slide by subjects have been expressly noted to be mathematics and languages followed by humanities. The bottom subjects are disclosed to always be the arts. This hierarchy inevitably develops only the brainiac and leaves out other parts of the body from the waist down. As contended, the reason for the educational systems emphasis for the development of academic abilities is to apparently impact the needs of industrialism (1). No transformations or adjustments have been made to refocus on rethinking the view of comprehension since. Robinson aptly enumerates three things about intelligence, to wit (a) that it is diverse (b) intelligence is dynamic and finally, (c) intelligence is distinct. He concludes his talk with the affirmation that we should date stampk to educate our children holistically both academic and creative skills, which is the only way to help them effectively see and make the most of the future. One is immensely touched and enlightened by Robinsons presentation. First, his manner of delivery is highly interesting as he effectively incorporates humor in the delivery, thus significantly enhancing audience appeal. Despite the frequent integration of humorous remarks, the main points are still successfully stressed and imbibed in the audiences minds. Likewise, the arguments are presented in such a formal and credibl e manner that confirms his expertise in the subject. One can therefore guessing that his previous experience as a university professor adds credibility and reliability to the topic being discussed, and to his ability to present the information in a logical yet interesting manner. Thus, his knowledge of rhetorical appeals greatly contributes to providing the needed audience